Semantic Frames of ‘Rabb’ in the Quran (A Cognitive Linguistics Approach Validated through Hadith Triangulation and Islamic Epistemological Framework)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51590/waraqat.v10i2.1175Keywords:
Frame Semantics, Cognitive Linguistics, Quranic Arabic, Rububiyyah, Conceptual Metaphor, Sahih Hadith, Islamic EpistemologyAbstract
This study investigates the semantic frames and conceptual constructions of the term رَبّ (rabb/Lord) in the Quran through a cognitive linguistic approach, specifically Frame Semantics (Fillmore, 1982) and Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). While the concept of rububiyyah has been extensively studied theologically, systematic semantic-cognitive analysis of this fundamental concept remains limited. Using a mixed-methods design, we analyzed 25 representative verses from the Quranic Arabic Corpus through a five-stage frame identification protocol. Six primary semantic frames were identified: Divine_Creation, Divine_Provision, Divine_Guidance, Divine_Sovereignty, Divine_Nurturing, and Divine_Mercy, with significant differences in frame frequency between Makki and Madani revelations (χ²=18.47, p<0.01). Three dominant conceptual metaphors structure the concept of Rabb: RUBUBIYYAH IS NURTURING, RUBUBIYYAH IS SOVEREIGNTY, and DIVINE PROVISION IS DESCENDING. Findings were triangulated with classical tafsir (Ibn Kathir, al-Tabari), five sahih hadiths (Bukhari, Muslim), and Salafi scholarship (Ibn Uthaymin, Ibn Baz), demonstrating that cognitive linguistic methods can enhance semantic understanding of the Quran without compromising theological authenticity.
References
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Tabari, M. ibn J. (2001). Jami' al-bayan 'an ta'wil ay al-Qur'an (A. ibn A. al-Turki, Ed., Vols. 1-24). Dar Hijr.
Al-Uthaymeen, M. ibn S. (2004). Sharh al-'aqidah al-wasitiyyah. Dar Ibn al-Jawzi.
Dukes, K., & Atwell, E. (2012). NWAV, a corpus of Quranic Arabic annotated with pronominal anaphora. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 1175-1180. ELRA.
El-Awa, S. M. S. (2006). Textual relations in the Qur'an: Relevance, coherence and structure. Routledge.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111-137). Hanshin Publishing.
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. F. (2006). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 791-816). Oxford University Press.
Ibn Baz, A. ibn A. (1997). Majmu' fatawa wa-maqalat mutanawwi'ah (M. ibn S. al-Shuwai'ir, Ed., Vols. 1-30). Dar al-Qasim.
Ibn Kathir, I. ibn U. (1999). Tafsir al-Qur'an al-'azim (S. ibn M. Salamah, Ed., 2nd ed., Vols. 1-8). Dar Taibah.
Izutsu, T. (1964). God and man in the Qur'an: Semantics of the Qur'anic Weltanschauung. Keio University.
Izutsu, T. (1966). Ethico-religious concepts in the Qur'an. McGill University Press.
Lakhfif, M. N., Ghazali, S., & Rashwan, M. (2015). A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(4), 551-563.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Mir, M. (1986). Coherence in the Qur'an: A study of Islahi's concept of nazm in Tadabbur-i-Qur'an. American Trust Publications.
Syarif, M., et al. (2023). Quran interpretation methodology, new media, and ideological contestation of Salafi in Sambas. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 79(1), a8814.
.png)
